Buddy Slim Connect, Inspire and Lose Weight Together!
BuddySlim-O-Meter
869,983 Lbs
Lost and counting!

Calories burned for sex, active, vigorous effort

Category: Sexual Activity

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
BuddySlimmers. Help, this activity needs a description. Add yours.

 

Sign Up Now! Free diet and exercise journal
Submitted by:
Dr Marc
Last edited by:
Dr Marc
Calories burned by:
Heart
Lee
Cheryl
nancy
Sarah
Add Activity to Journal

sex, active, vigorous effort burns
105 calories per hour
Assuming weight of 154 lbs or 70 kg
Time Spent (hrs:mins)
Add to Favorites

 
Popularity: 75% [?]

Related Foods:
  • sex, passive, light effort, kissing, hugging
  • Sex, Moderate Effort

    • Tags:

    Written by: Dr Marc

    Rank It!

     

    Top Diet and Fat Loss Programs
    Number 1 Number 2 Number 3
    omg truth idiots
    OMG Fat Loss Truth About Abs Fat Loss 4 Idiots
    stars-5-0 stars-4-0 stars-2-5
    Visit OMG Fat Loss

    		 Visit Truth About Abs

    		 Visit Fat Loss 4 Idiots
    Click Here for Review Click Here for Review Click Here for Review

    This entry was posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2008 at 11:42 am and is filed under Sexual Activity. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    2 Comments so far

    1. sfauthor@August 11th, 2009

      Nice posting. Do you know about these kundalini books?

      http://www.YogaVidya.com/freepdfs.html

    2. Medifast Coupons@September 9th, 2009

      Great sex calorie burner app … smart idea, but it doesn’t have as good of an impact as I thought it would. I showed it to my wife in hopes to help convince her sex would give her a good benefit, but she didn’t buy into it. Maybe I will show it to my girlfriend instead!

    Leave a Reply

    This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)

    You must read and type the 5 chars within 0..9 and A..F, and submit the form.

      

    Oh no, I cannot read this. Please, generate a